Myanmar leader and the Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi has decided not to join in the session of the UN General Assembly during Rohingaya crisis. However, on the same day she addressed her countrymen in Myanmar only.

What is the reason that as a Nobel Peace laureate and pro-democracy known Aung San Suu Kyi not arrived in this session of the UN General Assembly?

International Affairs expert Pushpesh Pant told the BBC that the reason for not going to attend this session of Aung San Suu Kyi is clear. They think that they will try to encircle them all the nations who are patrons of human values on the Rohingya issue and since they are the Nobel Peace Prize winner, then this situation will surely be confused for them.

Pushpesh Pant, while questioning the United Nations, said that if Aung San Suu Kyi did not attend that convention, which mountain was broken? Is the UN today an institution that has no significance or importance - in strategic or any other kind of international politics?

Professor Pant said, "98 percent of this institution's budget is spent on its employees' pension and allowances. Except that there are some pointless discussions in the Security Council and the proposals are passed. I do not understand what difference it does not go there."

Pushpesh Pant further said that after teaching and reading 40-42 years international relations, I have found that since the war, the structural weaknesses of the winners who formed the United Nations after the war were so severe that in today's world some of their Significance has not remained.

Pushpesh Pant says, 'America, which is said to cut costs by simplifying the bureaucracy of the United Nations, that I think is very worthwhile suggestion. But what can the USA do? America is definitely the biggest donor to the United Nations budget."

Professor Pushpesh Pant said, "In the United States, however, suggestions for improvement have not come for the first time. I remember when I draw in different directions three horse carriage that was in his youth when Khrushchev gave a suggestion to "Troyka". But I think 60 years have passed since then, but there is no difference anywhere. In my opinion there is understandable absence of Aung San Suu Kyi, but to present her side, I will not say it.''

Pushpesh Pant, raising the question, said, "The action which is expected from Aung San Suu Kyi is not what she does, then what is the alternative to the international community? After imposing all the economic sanctions, when you can not stop North Korea, what would you spoil Suu Kyi? Will you impose economic sanctions against them? Will you talk about military intervention to protect human rights?

Professor Pushpesh Pant, criticizing the West, says that the west was glorified Suu Kyi as a protector of human rights. Today, she has embraced like Bhasmasur.

Pushpesh Pant says, Rohingya problem is human and emotional, but it is not so straightforward and simple. The way in India it is being linked with Hindutva, the policy of Muslims and secularism. Which is the reason for sheltering those refugees that they will also enter a large number and they will be in those places where they want to live. It does not understand how they reach the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Pushpesh Pant says, "Rohingya can be innocent. But Rohingyas have not created a stateless person by Aung San Suu Kyi. Its history is 50-60 years old. I think that it is futile to blame Aung San Suu Kyi more than necessary.

(Click here for Android APP of IBTN. You can follow us on facebook and Twitter)

Share This News

About sharing